Five Stags failures outlined

The operator of Pirongia’s Five Stags Restaurant and Bar breached licensing laws for years, the Alcohol Regulatory and Licensing Authority has heard.

Five Stags

Five Stags operator Night Pearl Ltd, whose sole shareholder is Nora Fu, was told in September last year that the front and left side outside area of the building could not be used to consume alcohol until a licence variation was granted for those areas.

But during a police-controlled purchase operation in December alcohol was sold by a 16-year-old staff member to a 17-year-old who was not asked for age identification. The underage drinker was allowed to sit outside the licenced area to consume the alcohol.

“There appears to be an ongoing disregard for the assistance given or an inability to understand the obligations of a licensee,” the Waipā District Licensing Committee found in February. It was not confident that the licensee understood the obligations of a licensee and declined renewal of a licence.

Fu, who had operated with an uncertificated manager on duty, and had failed to maintain the manager’s register, appealed to the authority last Thursday.

Fu’s counsel Sarah Rawcliffe said her client had represented herself before the licencing committee hearing and felt it was incorrect in finding the licence should not be renewed.

Rawcliffe said there was “a significant amount of confusion” throughout the prior process.

Hearing chair Judge Simon Menzies said the appellant’s submission implied criticism of the licensing committee. But Rawcliffe accepted the confusion was the appellant’s issue.

Judge Menzies said the appellant had received a plan showing a clearly defined licensing area that covered to the roofline of the building.

“It was not clear that it could not serve alcohol out the front of the premises,” Rawcliffe said. “This is on the basis that it had been done for many years.”

Judge Menzies asked Rawcliffe: “Is it clear to you?” Rawcliffe said it was.

Pirongia’s Five Stags

Robert Davies, counsel for liquor licensing inspector Mary Fernandez, said the key issue was the applicant’s suitability to hold a liquor licence.

“You need to be able to trust your licensee to understand their obligation and meet them substantiality, not superficially,” he said.

Davies reminded the authority that the Employment Relations Authority had ordered the appellant to pay more than $21,000 in compensation in 2023 following the unjustified dismissal of an employee.

He also spoke of an overriding impression of a patronage in a considerable state of disorder.

“Is it any wonder the controlled purchase operation failed?’

The Five Stags has been forbidden from selling alcohol since May 19, but continues to promote “Cold beer, great food, tall tales….” on its website.

The authority reserved its decision, promising a decision in writing.

“I am not going to put a time frame on that,” Judge Menzies said.

More Recent News

Building a champion

24 April 2025 The original article has been changed. Timmo’s ITM is still owned and operated by Clayton and Nicky Timmo and not Jack Mathis’ brother. Timmo’s joined ITM in 2004 and after nearly 40…

Kennedy fluoride move greeted

Anti-fluoride campaigners are claiming another victory as the United States administration takes an increasingly negative view of the use of the chemical. The latest move has seen US Health Secretary Robert Kennedy announcing plans to…

Board neutral on water option

The consultation process surrounding the formation of a seven-council controlled water authority has been described as a bitter pill to swallow. Te Awamutu-Kihikihi Community board member Sally Whitaker said she felt like Waipā District Council’s…

Creativity on show

Te Awamutu Creative Fibre group members will show off their mastery in town next week. An array of products, many of them made from scratch using centuries-old skills, will be available for purchase, including a…